ringo
Full Member
Posts: 214
|
Post by ringo on Jun 1, 2011 12:37:00 GMT -5
You could try to point out that Gumpy didn't try to stop anyone from bandwagoning Marth, so it seems unlikely that they were connected?
But only point that out if you think it's a reasonable position and one you're willing to defend. Because pretty much guaranteed, anything you say in Phalla will be used against you later.
|
|
|
Post by stever777 on Jun 1, 2011 12:39:48 GMT -5
Good point about Gumpy. Sending...
|
|
ringo
Full Member
Posts: 214
|
Post by ringo on Jun 1, 2011 12:41:42 GMT -5
It looks like we may have to sacrafice Marth tonight. If that's the case should we take out kime tonight immediately since suspicion is going to fall on Ringo anyway or do we hope kime vouches for him? If Marth eats the vote he should use Last Gasp Mindblast on kime. Marth already voted for kime, and it's likely that it'll make narration exactly like that: Marth get fried by Quicken, but turns around and fries kime in the process. If Marth avoids the vote then we'll just ignore kime for the day and use our regular mindblast on him tomorrow, as that should worry some people having a new method of killing show up in the narration.
|
|
|
Post by stever777 on Jun 1, 2011 12:43:25 GMT -5
Nope. I got hit day 1 and haven't been able to get fixed up either.
|
|
|
Post by stever777 on Jun 1, 2011 12:46:08 GMT -5
This may be turning on me -
Hmm. Good point. Get back to you after lunch.
|
|
ringo
Full Member
Posts: 214
|
Post by ringo on Jun 1, 2011 12:49:13 GMT -5
Like I said, you've gotta be ready to defend whatever it is you say. It's a hard road to tread, soft networking
|
|
ringo
Full Member
Posts: 214
|
Post by ringo on Jun 1, 2011 12:52:06 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by peccavi on Jun 1, 2011 12:52:23 GMT -5
From HV: " Peccavi wrote: HeavyVillain wrote: Keep in mind that Im boooored now
Ed can go to hell for clarification denying about conversions We're thinking of having you use infidel's ability on rend, but that means we need to heal you, right? Definitely, otherwise Ill die
Not sure how I feel about roleblocking Rend though"
Not sure why HV wouldn't want to roleblock Rend. Little suspicious.
|
|
ringo
Full Member
Posts: 214
|
Post by ringo on Jun 1, 2011 12:54:29 GMT -5
Also interesting the 38th is talking to you and not posting in the thread.
hrm
|
|
|
Post by Balefuego on Jun 1, 2011 12:57:13 GMT -5
Why would using infidel's ability kill him? It's the actual power stealing that hurts him, not using the stolen power I though?
|
|
ringo
Full Member
Posts: 214
|
Post by ringo on Jun 1, 2011 12:57:16 GMT -5
Yeah that is definitely suspicious on HV's part. Especially when what we really want is Rend seered.
Hmmm...
And I thought he only lost health if he used Simulacrum?
|
|
|
Post by Balefuego on Jun 1, 2011 12:59:01 GMT -5
Someone should point this out in the thread no? Not sure who it would sound best coming from
|
|
ringo
Full Member
Posts: 214
|
Post by ringo on Jun 1, 2011 13:00:57 GMT -5
Problem is - nobody's actually using this reasoning in thread for voting for Marth
They're just voting for Marth because they've seen his name in red
edit by "This reasoning" I mean the "Gumpy was evil and protecting Marth" reasoning.
As soon as someone tries to use that in thread, blast them with the truth
|
|
|
Post by Balefuego on Jun 1, 2011 13:04:15 GMT -5
A bunch of people used that argument earlier, now it's just bandwagoning though
|
|
ringo
Full Member
Posts: 214
|
Post by ringo on Jun 1, 2011 13:13:06 GMT -5
Well, the rest of us shouldn't touch it. When Marth eventually goes down, even if it's not today, we don't want to be linked to him if we can help it.
However! Marth, when you get a chance you should take a turn defending yourself by pointing out the fact that Gumpy voted for you, making the cries of Marth+Gumpy=Lovers kind of silly
|
|